Since January, Nick Timothy MP has asked the PM and defence and energy ministers who is individually responsible for the security of our offshore infrastructure.
Russia and China are targeting interconnectors and our wind turbines, and there’s no plan and no minister in charge.
Above you can watch Mr Timothy’s question to Luke Pollard, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Armed Forces, on Monday 24 March 2025. You can also see the exchange from Hansard transcribed below.
—-
Hansard: Defence of Undersea Infrastructure
Volume 764: debated on Monday 24 March 2025
What steps he is taking to strengthen the UK’s defences against threats to undersea infrastructure. (903343)
Luke Pollard MP (Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Armed Forces): We are committed to maintaining and enhancing the security and resilience of critical undersea infrastructure. Just as the Defence Secretary called out the activities of the Russian spy ship Yantar hovering over our undersea cables, let those who threaten the UK or our allies be in no doubt that we will defend our undersea infrastructure. This is one area that the strategic defence review is looking at in order to enhance our homeland security.
Nick Timothy MP: In January, I asked the Defence Secretary which single Minister is responsible for the security of offshore infrastructure. We know that Russia and China target interconnectors and undersea cables, we know that Russia places listening devices on our wind turbines to monitor submarines, and we know that China controls the tech in the turbines that the Energy Secretary wants to buy. The Defence Secretary could not answer me in January, and neither did the Prime Minister when I asked him earlier this month. When are we going to find out who is actually in charge?
Luke Pollard MP (Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Armed Forces): There is no doubt in my mind that the Prime Minister is responsible for the security of this nation, and he delegates different areas to different Departments. That is a completely normal way of dealing with our national security. Let us be absolutely clear: within Defence, we take this seriously and we work with colleagues across Departments to make sure that we are not only securing our infrastructure from a defence perspective, but using our trade routes to make sure that we are protecting and buying the right technology and using our planning system to make sure that, where there is development, it does not impinge on our national security.
See Hansard here.
