A column for Suffolk News, by Nick Timothy MP.
Published in the Newmarket Journal on 18 September 2025
When it introduced its local government reform proposals last year, the Government called them a form of ‘devolution’.
But these plans are anything but.
Instead of power being handed down to local communities by central government, decision-making responsibilities and control of budgets will be sucked up from district councils to unitaries and from councils to mayoralties. These bodies will govern enormous and very diverse territories from distant towns and cities.
Not only will they make decisions even more remote for local communities concerned with issues such as improving road safety and planning, they also provide cover for the abolition of Suffolk Constabulary and its merger with Norfolk’s police force.
And the Government’s plans are even more concerning. Because they are a ruse to redistribute taxes to Labour-voting towns and cities.
Here in West Suffolk, we face a Suffolk and Norfolk mayoralty —probably run from Norwich— and a new unitary council structure, with either one council run from Ipswich or three different councils.
Given our place on the map, Cambridge is more important to us than Norwich or Ipswich. Yet there is little in the Government’s proposals to help us to exploit the economic opportunities presented by better transport connections and business opportunities coming out of one of the most dynamic cities in the country.
Of course, questions about the tax burden and distribution of revenues are fundamental. Given the state of the public finances, any savings made through local government reform might be snaffled by the Treasury. Services provided by district councils might be cut to subsidise services funded by the county council, such as adult social care.
Council debt across Suffolk stands at £1.1 billion, but there is huge variation between the councils; in Ipswich, debt per person is nearly £1,800, while in West Suffolk, it is less than £50. There is a similar story with tax.
Ipswich charges the highest council tax of any shire district in the country. To equalise tax across a single Suffolk unitary council would mean massive tax rises for people living in West Suffolk, tax cuts for people in Ipswich, which would retain services unavailable to my constituents, or a worst-of-both-worlds combination.
Suffolk’s councils have their different proposals, but ultimately it will be Whitehall that decides.
I spoke about this in the House of Commons earlier this month, and I am pressing ministers and those advocating a particular model for us locally for the clear answers that we in West Suffolk need and deserve.
First, will all the money saved stay in Suffolk?
Second, will people in West Suffolk pay more in council tax as a result of this change?
Will we end up funding services for Ipswich that we do not get?
Third, will town and parish councils be given a greater say in the planning process?
Fourth, will town and parish councils have greater powers over things such as road safety and speed limits?
Fifth, will we get an absolute guarantee that there will be no merger between Suffolk and Norfolk police forces?
This whole process is too rushed and completely unsatisfactory. It was wrong to postpone our local elections this year. The proposed reforms have not been though through and the consequences are not clear.
There may be some upsides to reform and there may even be some benefits in principle to unitary councils, but unless we get convincing answers, I will oppose not just the Government’s legislation to put these changes into effect but the changes to local government in Suffolk.
